Support our mission and become a member!
home H logo
the HOM Network

1950: Senator Joseph McCarthy’s Red Scare Begins

Senator Joseph McCarthy brandishing a list of supposed communists in the U.S. government, igniting a nationwide frenzy of suspicion and fear.

Senator Joseph McCarthy brandishing a list of supposed communists in the U.S. government, igniting a nationwide frenzy of suspicion and fear.

What Happened?

During the early years of the Cold War, tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union ran high. With communism spreading globally, many American leaders feared it could take root at home. Seizing on that fear, Senator Joseph McCarthy found his issue: rooting out ‘traitors’ in the U.S. government.

On February 9, 1950, McCarthy claimed he had a list of 205 communists working in the State Department. The number changed frequently, but the effect was the same—headlines blared, panic spread, and McCarthy’s rise to power was cemented.

In the following years, McCarthy wielded his influence ruthlessly, accusing public figures, military officers, and even fellow senators of communist sympathies. Careers were destroyed, and dissent became dangerous.

By 1954, McCarthy turned his sights on the U.S. Army, launching televised hearings that exposed his reckless tactics. Americans watched as lawyer Joseph Welch famously asked, 'Have you no sense of decency, sir?' That moment marked the beginning of McCarthy’s downfall.

Later that year, the Senate officially censured McCarthy, stripping him of power. Just three years later, he died in disgrace. However, the fear-driven politics he championed—blacklists, loyalty oaths, and labeling dissenters as 'un-American'—continue to resurface in modern times.

Why It Matters

McCarthyism wasn’t just about communism—it was about fear, control, and the erosion of civil liberties. It showed how dangerous political rhetoric can be when driven by paranoia rather than facts. The Red Scare led to blacklists, wrongful imprisonments, and the silencing of voices across journalism, academia, and the arts. Today, it serves as a warning: when we sacrifice truth for security, who really wins? And at what cost?

Stay curious!